Find out how we test.īoth cameras have full-frame CMOS sensors, but the EOS R has slightly higher resolution at 30.3 million pixels versus 26.2 million pixels in the EOS RP. Why you can trust Digital Camera World Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. So we’ve broken down all the key specifications and differences to examine them one by one to help you decide which is best for you the deliberately cheap Canon EOS RP or the newly-cheap Canon EOS R. It's also not a whole lot more expensive than the cheapskate (sorry, Canon) EOS RP. And at today's prices, the EOS R, even without in-body stabilization, looks rather good. But the camera market being what it is, the prices dropped, and dropped, and dropped. It's a rather good camera with plenty of qualities and plenty of life left in it. That left the original EOS R looking a bit sick and old. Both were more advanced than the dear old EOS R, both had full-width 4K (the EOS R5, of course, has 8K too), and both had in-body stabilization. For a long time that was the status quo.īut then the EOS R5 (opens in new tab) and EOS R6 (opens in new tab) happened. The EOS RP was a much cheaper entry point into Canon’s new EOS R system, and suddenly you had to figure out whether the more advanced specs and build of the EOS R were really worth the money. When Canon introduced the EOS RP (opens in new tab) it also introduced a lot of questions. Cheapest full frame cameras (opens in new tab).Best mirrorless cameras (opens in new tab).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |